Administration of Contracts in Business Law

Two parties may decide to form an agreement in concern for their business. And for that reason, each of them will leave saying that they have a deal. However, the law differentiates between enforceable agreements from mere promises. When parties present themselves to the court alleging that one of them refused to perform according to their agreements, the court looks at their promises and check whether all the elements of agreement exist. If they exist, then the court will enforce such agreement.   Keywords:   Enforceability, Offer, Acceptance, Consideration Contract law supervises people in the administration of their promises. It is necessary to recognize that not all agreements that people form are enforceable in the eyes of the law. For a court to enforce a deal, it must look for the presence the elements of an agreement. If all of them exist, then the court will proceed to force the parties to perform their obligations. As an illustration, this paper will analyze a case between Peter and Brett (Nephew) and decide whether there is an enforceable agreements of not. The explanation whether the uncle/nephew relationship has any effect on whether or not there is a binding agreement is a matter of presumption applied to cases of social and domestic agreements. When looking at these agreements, their enforceability dwells on their subject matter as opposed to the parties’ relationship. In most cases, agreements originating from a business setting have a presumption that the parties intended to create a legal relationship (Koffman, & Atkins, 2014). The rule doesn’t even apply to domestic relationship, but also to any commercial context where free gifts are offered as in (Esso Petroleum Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, 1976) Concerning family cases, a good example of the application of a binding agreement between relatives is in (Parker v Clarke, 1960). This case involved elderly relatives convincing a young couple to dispose their house and relocate with them. The elderly relatives promised them that they would give the young couple a share in their house in return. However, their relationship fell out, and the elderly couple dismissed the young couple. When the matter went to the court, the court rebutted the presumption given to the domestic agreements and held that the agreement was enforceable. Similarly, in the case of (Merritt v Merritt, 1970) the court rebutted the presumption both the husband and wife in had no intention to form a legal relationship in their agreement. So like this case, Brett should not assume that the court will be blinded by the fact that he was contracting with his uncle. The court will look at the subject matter of the agreement which is the ‘sale of a car.' The law of contract dismisses any thought that the acceptance can occur by the silence from the offeree. On the other side, it also explains to what extent a silence can indicate a sign of acceptance. However, it's not a silence as such. It's a situation where the offeree's conduct demonstrates an acceptance of an offer. For instance, in (Brogden v. Metropolitan Railway Co, 1877), the court held that the plaintiff accepted the offer the moment he made the amendments and sent the draft to the defendant. Also, the court traced a sign of acceptance by indicating that the actions of the parties demonstrated acceptance. That is, the plaintiff sent the coal after the agreement, and the defendant accepted the coal.   Additionally, in (RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Muller GmbH & Co KG, 2010), the Supreme Court ruled that as far as the parties had carried out their obligations, it meant that they had accepted the terms of their agreement even though they had not signed it. The court went on clarifying that the parties’ conduct had shown that they had performed as if the contract draft applied, and they treated it as if it was already a contract. The same principles were applied to (Limited v Amphenol Limited, 2009) Tekdata bought some from Amphenol and indicated that it would be its and condition that would guide their contract. On the other side, Amphenol disputed those sentiments and said that Amphenol's terms and conditions would administer the agreement. Nevertheless, the parties continued with their normal trade until when the dispute emerged. In solving the dispute, the court of appeal held that Amphenol was the last to issue its terms, so its declarations would apply. These kind of judgments are more popular in cases where one party commences work before they agree to the terms of the contract. So like the mentioned cases, Peter’s terms would prevail. Consideration is a fundamental constituent of any enforceable contract. In English law, any contract without a consideration is   treated as voidable. In other words, if one party promises another something without getting something in return, the law cannot enforce such a promise.   A valuable explanation to consideration is in (Currie v Misa, 1875). The judge said consideration is, "some right, interest, profit, or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss, or responsibility, given, suffered or undertaken by the other" Also, the House of Lords described consideration as the "price that one to a contract pays for the promise or the performance of the other party," (Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge & Co Ltd, 1915). Like offer, and acceptance, even consideration has some rules that attached to its validity. In (Turner, 2013), the book summarizes the rules of consideration into three principles; these are that "the consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate. The second rule is that past consideration would not be a useful consideration, and the third one is that consideration must come from the promise." In the concerned question, this paper will concentrate with the first principle. By stating that consideration must be sufficient but that it need not be adequate, this means that it requires that there should be an exchange of something of value but not something equivalent to whatever you received. In other words, there should be an existence of a bargain, though it doesn't have to be a good one. The same explanation was given in (Korunich v Holliday, 2013) where the court stated that a "good consideration does not need to have a value comparable to the promise." So considering t he explanations above, $500 is a valid ‘consideration’ for a contract to sell the diesel motor car if the parties accept it. If Brett tells Peter that he would challenge the validity of the contract due the fact that he entered into the contract thinking he was buying a diesel car, but Peter gave him a diesel car, then it would be a question of unilateral mistake. In (Emanuel, 2010), Emanuel explain that â€Å"a unilateral mistake happens where one party to a contract is mistaken but and the other party is aware of the mistake.† This mistake may happen to the concern of a fundamental term, or it can be the identification of one of the contracting parties. Notably, if a unilateral mistake happens due an error in the quality, such error would not invalidate the contract. For instance, in (Smith v Hughes, 1871) the court held that the contract was enforceable even though the plaintiff had made a mistake to the oats. On the other hand, if the mistake touches the requisite part of the contract, i.e a fundamental term of a contract, and the other party knows the mistake, this can render the contract voidable. For example, in (Hartog v Colin & Shields, 1939) the judge ruled that the plaintiff was aware of the clerical mistake with the offer. As a result, the court dismissed the claim as it could not let the plaintiff benefit from of such a fundamental error. To clarify, the court ruled on behalf of the defendant stating that the plaintiff was supposed to consider that the defendant's intention wasn't to sell at such a low price. As for the case of Peter and Bett, the contract can be voidable due to a fundamental mistake. The procedure for contract arrangement starts with one party presenting an offer, and the other one accepting. The acceptance can be in writing, oral or in conduct. Apart from offer and acceptance, a valid agreement must have consideration. There is no rule to what consideration should be. For example, $1 for a car would be an adequate consideration. Koffman, L., & Atkins, R. (2014). Koffman & Macdonald's law of contract (8th ed., p. 79). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Miller, R. (2012). Fundamentals of business law (3rd ed., p. 154). Mason, Oh: South-Weston. Turner, C. (2013). Key facts and key cases (1st ed., p. 31). Routledge. Emanuel, S. (2010). Contracts (9th ed., p. 164). New York: Aspen Publishers. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge & Co Ltd (1915) Esso Petroleum Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (House of Lords 1976). RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Mà ¼ller GmbH & Co KG (2010) Tekdata Interconnections Limited v Amphenol Limited (2009)

Facility and venue management Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Facility and venue management - Assignment Example Located directly opposite the transit centre, this facility is accessible by both train and bus terminals and one would just walk a few minutes to be in within minutes. On arrival by plane into the international or domestic terminal, one takes an air train to Roma Street Transit centre and this takes very little time. Arrival bus is followed by disembarking at the transit centre on level 3 then level 2 before walking over the skylink to the escalators and the guest is at the doorstep of this paradise on Earth. The hotel is a multi-purpose and ultra-modern hospitality facility with different kinds of rooms and hall including a main hall, meeting rooms, stage, and kitchen as well, which suits various groups of clients. This facility offers wide variety of services from private functions such as internet surfing, to public activities like social events, meetings, community recreational activities and even travel desk for consultations. 2.0 Design Analysis 2.1 External Design Features Ba sically, Tinbilly Travellers Hotel has a one storey building, which is located on the edge of a 20-acre Roma street Parkland, with brown brick walls and grey top. The building ever looks very clean, sparkling and new. The size of the building is quite big, which is able to contain more than 400 people at the same time and accommodate others in its hostels. Since Tinbilly Travellers Hotel is located within the busy Roma street transit centre, it has a lot more open spaces on the ground floor available for use and a serene water body behind it in Brisbane River which is relatively close to the building. The landscaping in there is good, with a lagoon around the hotel at the back and along the street in which it is located. When one just gets there, local and international guests can feel fresh air and see the wide spaces all over the ground floor. The facility is easy to find and trace due to the big signade â€Å"Tinbilly Travellers Hotel† name on it near the main road along t he Roma street transit centre. With respect of the other feature of open spaces, the quality of the paving and corridors is excellent, probably because of regular maintenance by the hardworking staff and the Tinbilly Travellers Hotel seems quite new comparing to other hospitality facilities in this location. Besides, there are also a few rubbish bins around the building for dropping small scale refuse which is important considering its location within a cosmopolitan environment. There are various options of transport to access the hotel due to its strategic location within the busy city centre. One can drive to the building or readily walk after a short time connection from the air train or bus. Tinbilly Travellers Hotel has no private parking but the guests can use the free street parking that can accommodate many vehicles. The challenge is the ever increasing number of visiting people that strains the street parking and almost locks out some guests besides the gradually fading col our of parking spots lines. The entrance and exit to the Tinbilly Travellers Hotel is just faced to the main road. As the main road has high traffic flux due to the

Spanish Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Spanish - Essay Example En la otra mano, la migraccion es como un descanso durante el dia. Esta musica combiinada con la magnifica fotografia de Vittorio Storaro crea una gran escena de cuando los immigrantes entran por la luz. Lo mismo occurre para la danza illustrada en la pelicula. Una gran escena para explicar como la musica y el baile crean semtimientos en los caracteres cuando Laura y Elena bailan con el mismo hombre durante una cancion. Para mi esta escena es la sumatoria de toda la pelicula. El hombre esta supuesto a representar los sentimientos de Mario y como su corazon miente com ambas mujeres, La musica cambia un poco cuando las mujeras bailan con el hombre. El uso de colores en la pelicula tambien esta represntado en las sentimientos de los caracteres. El trasfondo durante los diferentes bailes illustran el sentir de la escena. Un punto de vista interesante cuando examine la pelicula por segunda vez, es que Elena siempre se viste de rojo. El color rojo puede significar muchas cosas. Y pienso que significa el amor mutuo entre Mario y Elena y tambien pienso que su amor era